Climate change, global warming, impending doom: sure, remember the year 2000?
Did you notice that the IPCC changed the name of Global Warming to Climate Change? Have you ever wondered why? Simple, because Global Warming, by definition, stated that humanity’s greenhouse gases were the cause of the planet’s warming. Just one problem, the planet stopped warming for 16 years and greenhouse gases increased dramatically, oops! Furthermore, all global warming projections fell short of the pessimistic climate model. Oh no, now what?
Now there was an interesting article in the New York Times on November 12, 2014 titled; “Wobbling on Climate Change”, in the opinion section of Piers J. Seller
When I read this I said to myself, “Really?” I mean “What a pathetic article”, I thought. You see, yes, we need Weather Science, but with such a large and complex system, why the hell are these scientists denying the mathematically proven attributes of Chaos Theory and trying to convince us that their Weather Science Supercomputer is accurate? ? Bull, it is not. They either know they are lying or they deny their own pillars and strong shoulders of dead white men.
Why is everyone so enamored with brainwashing the masses, turning CO2 (a trace gas) into a demon from the future of our species? Hell, there’s nothing wrong with carbon, you’re made of 17% of it, it’s a necessary element for life. It’s one of the things we look for when trying to find other suitable planets that could support life. Too funny, all this religious dogma style trying to justify stealing the energy sector by diverting perhaps trillions of dollars into the pockets of the architects of this scheme. Do you want to debate me? You can’t because you’ll be using fake data, rigged science, and best guesses from a chaotic system that we already know self-regulates in cycles, which it has been doing for hundreds of millions of years.
Now, may I ask: Who said that global warming is bad for life on Earth? Generally speaking, periods of warming are good for life, since it is the ICE AGE that we should be concerned about.
How much CO2 is the right amount and who are we to say? CO2 is a trace gas, not some horrible toxic thing. Sure, too much CO2 causes problems for human respiration, but it really has to increase significantly to get there. Without CO2 there would be no humans on the planet, and without carbon we would certainly look different and would have evolved differently here on this pale blue dot.
At some point, we need the science to clear up and the political climate agendas to go away; otherwise we can do something really stupid using groupthink. Please consider all this and think about it.
